Call of Duty: World at War

[DNoz29]

Been playing this recently. The solo campaign is decent, but the multiplayer is crap, IMO. It isn't even remotely as good as Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. COD 4 might be the best game I have ever played.

They tried to make a cut-and-paste version of the COD 4 online play and still managed to mess it up. Oh well, I guess. I can't wait for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (perhaps this year)!

I bet I'm in the minority on this, but was just wondering what anyone else thought.

[Seahawcla]

I really enjoy online for it, cant get into the story too much.

[ernieren]

I like the online for this game COD4 is better for the type it is but the bigger boards and some of the weopns i like better on this one.

[DNoz29]

I like the online for this game COD4 is better for the type it is but the bigger boards and some of the weopns i like better on this one.
If they would add Hardcore War to COD 4, I'd never play World at War again.

Also, my disdain of WWII games helps to fuel my less-than-stellar view of the game.

Jon, you should try COD 4. The online is better than WaW and the story is realistic and believable. And the cinematic feeling while playing is unmatched.

[Seahawcla]

Ive played both, COD4 story was better no doubt.

[ChicagoBears34]

I bought COD:World at War played it for 4 hours the first night I got it. Haven't put it in since.

[timonahan]

I love WAW, play it every day.

Well, my xbox died yesterday so I will not be playing anytime soon, but I like it a little more than 4.