I know its a GEM 10 but

[seahawks4ever]

really?? $100???

http://cgi.ebay.com/1979-TOPPS-2-STEVE-LARGENT-PSA-10-536_W0QQitemZ190123273801QQihZ009QQcategoryZ86863QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

[onyxdragon5977]

Ummmmm...wow. That's a little ridiculous.

[ernieren]

well remember how tuff it is to get Gem mints of vintage . some guy actually bid on it though .

[seahawks4ever]

well remember how tuff it is to get Gem mints of vintage . some guy actually bid on it though .

that was why I brought it up. I see stupid prices often for auctions. Not very often said retarded auction get a bid...:doh:

[GiantFan]

It's very tough to get a gem mint for those cards.

[seahawks4ever]

It's very tough to get a gem mint for those cards.

well then maybe $100 is ok but I just can't see buying a base card for $100 when you could get a couple Largent autos for that.

[GiantFan]

well then maybe $100 is ok but I just can't see buying a base card for $100 when you could get a couple Largent autos for that.

I agree and I wouldn't buy it but the older these cards get the less chance there is that another 10 will show up so it can only go up in value. Vintage collectors love gem mint vintage.

[Seahawcla]

That seller is my bread and butter for graded cards :salut:

And I would pay ridiculous prices if necessary to obtain some random base cards that were graded.

If a PSA 9 or 10 1989 Score Gaston Green showed up i'd pay a good amount because I havent seen one yet. Set collectors will pay over :drunk:

[rexvos]

that is cheap for a 10.

[andy]

PSA 10 of 70s stuff is so much better than a auto.....